Pitch your startup to a fund’s digital twin, before the real thing.
Morpheus is the home to digital twins of 250+ funds and accelerators, trained on their public record. Run your deck past a twin and read how they’d assess your startup from their lens, before you send it for real.
- Above bar
Northbeam Ventures
Your LinkedIn shows Revolut and then Palantir, and operator founders out of exactly that mould are most of what they have backed at pre-seed. Your £2M ask also sits inside their first-cheque range.
- Meets bar
Ambergate Capital
Screens for roughly £20k MRR at seed and your deck shows none. Everything else fits, so expect revenue to be the first question.
- Mixed signals
Slate Harbour
Closed a seed round last quarter with a company solving the same problem, so conflict risk is high before thesis fit is even discussed.
- Mixed signals
Ninefold
Says it writes up to £1.5M, but the largest cheque it has actually deployed is £250k. Your £2M round is well past that, so expect them only alongside a lead.
- Below bar
Palewater
Expects commercial revenue within 12 months of entry; your plan reaches first revenue at 36. Two years early for them.
Digital twins of + funds and accelerators
- Index Ventures
- Balderton
- Atomico
- Northzone
- Accel
- Point Nine
- Creandum
- Seedcamp
- Speedinvest
- Cherry Ventures
- EQT
- Antler
- Earlybird
- Octopus Ventures
- Notion Capital
- Dawn Capital
- Ada Ventures
- Molten Ventures
How it works
- 01
Add your deck
Upload a PDF or paste a DocSend link of your pitch deck.
- 02
Pick fund twins
Select one or more real funds and accelerators of interest.
- 03
Read the verdicts
For each one, see whether you'd pass their screening criteria and a breakdown of how they'd assess you.
Built on real fund data and behaviour
Each twin is modelled on a given fund or accelerator’s public record, so the feedback reflects how that fund thinks, beyond their website criteria.
- Previous investments
- Every deal they have done: stage, sector, geography, cheque size, and what those companies had in common at the point of entry.
- The partners who make the decisions and the founder profiles they keep returning to.
- Crunchbase
- Round history, co-investors and follow-on behaviour: who they lead with, and how far they carry a company.
- Thesis and website
- What they say they invest in, and the mandate they hold themselves to, their stage, focus and non-negotiables.
- Public writing and social
- Essays, podcasts, posts and interviews, where partners say out loud what excites them and what they pass on.
- Wider public data
- Press, portfolio signals and market commentary, resolved into the criteria this fund actually screens against.
What comes back
Screening results
10 Pass1 Partial- Scale of emissions abatementPartial
- Expected
- Quantified pathway to material annual CO2e abatement at full market penetration, with stated assumptions
- Observed
- Per-site savings only; no penetration-level case
Impact figures are measured and credible at the site level, but nothing extrapolates them to full market penetration, and no assumption set sits behind a claim at that scale. The pathway may well exist; it is not argued anywhere in the materials.
- Economics for a non-climate buyerPass
- Expected
- Cost, productivity or performance advantages that would justify adoption by a buyer indifferent to emissions
- Observed
- 12–18% energy saving, payback under 9 months
Savings are framed as direct operating cost reduction with payback inside a year, and pricing takes a share of the realised saving rather than a licence fee. An operator indifferent to the emissions outcome still has a reason to buy, which is the whole test here.
Then decide who to actually pitch.
Discover funds that align with you, prioritise your outreach based on fund fit, and optimise your chances before applying.